Michelin LTX A/T2 VS BFGoodrich T/A KO2 Both of these tires are All-Terrain, have excellent durability, and are top-of-the-line.
Michelin A/T2 tires are good for on-road surfaces, but BF Goodrich KO2 tires are better for off-road.
It has some excellent features, which show their strengths in specific situations, such as how the A/T2 is designed to reduce noise levels on the road, something often overlooked in All-Terrain tires.
Table of Contents
A comparison of the Michelin LTX A/T2 VS BFGoodrich T/A KO2
A/T2 tires have a compound design. In comparison to BF Goodrich KO2, its tread pattern is straighter and less jagged.
By keeping more surface area of the tire in contact with the road, it is well suited to dry roads. Due to its narrower grooves and smaller tread pattern, this tire is more traditional in appearance compared to the aggressive KO2.
Its grooves run in a slanted, singular direction, and its shoulders are narrower. However, that doesn’t mean it performs poorly in corners. For challenging paths, the A/T2’s shoulders have biting edges.
Due to its unique characteristics, the BFG KO2 is a popular off-road tire.
Its wider grooves and interlocking tread pattern make it an All-Terrain tire and allow it to function well in gravelly areas because they help evacuate stones.
Additionally, the grooves are wider and deeper than those on the Michelin AT2, so it performs better on muddy terrain. When driving in wet conditions, the 3-D sipes of the tire help slide water away.
Furthermore, its shoulders have biting edges that provide maximum traction in snow.
Due to these features, this tire may not be appropriate for on-road driving because a smaller surface area is in contact with the road, resulting in poor traction.
Comparison of off-road traction
On hard-packed surfaces, the A/T2 has excellent traction and stability. Due to its close placement of blocks compared to KO2, it has a good grip on hard surfaces due to its large contact patch.
The shoulders of the animal have biting edges that assist in navigating such paths as well. The A/T2’s performance in snow or mud is not as good as it could be since its grooves are narrower and there is less room for mud/snow particles to pass through.
Also, since the cuts on the tire are open from one side to the other, it would cause the vehicle to slide.
Its independent tread block design, coupled with Michelin Biting Edges and stone ejectors, enable it to perform well on pebbles and rocky terrain.
Due to its open tread design, the KO2 is well-suited for a variety of off-road terrains. Additionally, it has special stone ejectors to get rid of gravel that might get stuck in the grooves due to its deep and wide grooves.
As a result of its deep and wide grooves with an interlocking tread pattern, it has better snow traction. The sidewall also has side biter lugs, which improve snow traction.
When driving in a colder climate, it meets the Severe Snow Service criteria.
It has wide grooves with 3-D sipes to help improve traction in muddy areas by throwing the tire backwards. Raised shoulders aid in the release of compacted mud, improving traction.
Treadwear and durability
The A/T2 is designed for long-term durability and tread wear. Besides having radial construction, the tire also has steel belts within its structure, which makes it more durable.
Additionally, these two things help prevent punctures.
With its interlocking tread pattern, the KO2 is also highly durable. The KO2 features bruise-resistant sidewall rubber, as well as new rubber formulation and design to avoid protruding objects.
Snagging and splitting are reduced by these design elements, making the tire more durable.
Comparison of on-road traction
Due to its dense design, the A/T2 performs well on the road and offers a comfortable driving experience.
Its groove design is smaller than that of the BFGoodrich KO2, so it has more surface area in contact with the road, which makes it perform better. A/T2 remains effective even on wet roads because of its larger number of sipes.
The KO2 has a larger tread pattern, deeper grooves, and wider shoulders, which make for a loud and rowdy driving experience.
The wide grooves cause air friction to hit the tire, causing it to go back and forth. The tire has less surface area in contact with the road, resulting in a lower grip.
Comparing comfort levels
On the road, the A/T2 is more comfortable. Because of its denser design with fewer spaces in between, it creates less noise when driving on roads.
KO2 produces much more noise on the road because it has wide grooves with more spaces, so more air particles are trapped within the grooves, causing more noise.
With its wider grooves, the KO2 feels like a lower-inflated tire off-road and very few jerks are felt in the cabin.
FInal thoughts on Michelin LTX A/T2 VS BFGoodrich T/A KO2
- Goodrich KO2 and Michelin LTX A/T2 are both All-Terrain tires.
- In comparison to the A/T1, the A/T2 has a more compact tread design, which means that it has more surface area to perform well on the road.
- With its wide grooves and wider shoulders, the Goodrich KO2 is better suited for off-roading than the A/T2.
- Durable and long-lasting, both pieces are made from high-quality materials
Video Comparison of Michelin LTX A/T2 VS BFGoodrich T/A KO2
References and Resources: