Goodyear Assurance Outlast Vs Goodyear Assurance MaxLife? Which One Should we buy? Both tires are designed to perform well in all weather conditions. However, when we compared the 205/55R16 sizes of the two tires, we found a few differences.
Although the overall traction of MaxLife is superior on dry, wet, and icy roads due to its narrower grooves and numerous sipes, the hydroplaning resistance of Outlast is superior due to its higher void ratio.
Nevertheless, these were not the only huge differences that we found. Which tire offers better comfort and lower rolling resistance? Let’s find out!
Table of Contents
Comparison of Goodyear Assurance Outlast and Assurance MaxLife
With an asymmetrical tread pattern, the Assurance Outlast features two outer shoulders and three central ribs sandwiched between them. Four deep longitudinal grooves run around the tread, separating the ribs from the shoulders. The lateral grooves, however, are missing.
Additionally, the shoulders are broader in comparison, and the shoulder blocks are also larger. The sipes are less on both the central part and the shoulder lugs.
Additionally, the Assurance MaxLife comes with an asymmetrical tread design to provide weather resistance. Three central ribs can be found between its two outer shoulders in the tread design.
The shoulders and central ribs are separated by narrower grooves running around the tread, and there are deep sipes throughout the tire. Additionally, the shoulders are compact and the shoulder blocks are closely positioned.
Comparison of grips
The circumfrencial grooves of the Assurance Outlast are wider than those of the Assurance Outlast. As a result, its contact patch gets smaller, resulting in poor performance on dry roads.
As a result of the higher void ratio, the braking distance also increases. The same is true for this tire’s performance on wet and icy roads.
On the central part, there are fewer shallow sipes. Thus, this tire’s grip on these surfaces is also compromised, resulting in a longer braking distance.
However, due to the wider grooves, it has a better grip on snowy surfaces, which results in better performance.
MaxLife, however, provides better grip on dry roads due to its narrower grooves. In addition, its asymmetric tread pattern further enhances traction.
As a result, the vehicle is more stable on dry surfaces and the braking distance is shorter. The deep sipes work exceptionally well to provide excellent traction on wet surfaces due to their numerous deep channels. This also reduces the braking distance on wet surfaces.
The same performance is achieved on icy roads as well. Due to its lower void ratio, MaxLife is unable to maintain its grip on snowy surfaces. As a result, its performance on snowy roads is poor.
Comparison of handling
Both of these tires perform poorly on dry roads due to the open shoulder design of the Outlast. As a result, the vehicle takes longer to complete a lap on dry tracks.
On wet and icy surfaces, the tire exhibited the same performance. Sipes found on the shoulder blocks are not good enough to maintain traction.
As a result, performance on these tracks is compromised. When it comes to snowy surfaces, however, the wide shoulders help increase the biting edge of the tires. As a result, its performance on snow is impressive.
MaxLife’s dry handling is distinguished by its compact shoulders and closely packed shoulder lugs. The drivers experience enhanced grip and superior handling on dry tracks.
As a result, the vehicle was able to complete a lap relatively quickly. On top of that, we also found deep and numerous sipes on the shoulder lugs, which enhanced the tire’s handling capabilities on wet and icy tracks.
However, the same performance was not observed when the vehicle was driven on snow. As a result of the compact shoulders, the vehicle took longer to complete a lap on a snowy surface.
Hydroplaning Resistance Comparison
Outlast provides superior hydroplaning resistance on flooded roads. With its deep and wide grooves, it is incredibly effective at wiping away water. This reduces the risk of accidents.
However, MaxLife loses to its competitor when it comes to hydroplaning resistance. These tires have narrower grooves, so their ability to evacuate water is reduced. As a result, it will have difficulty moving forward on flooded roads, increasing the likelihood of accidents.
Rolling resistance comparison
A tire’s rolling resistance is directly proportional to its contact patch. Outlast has a higher void ratio, which indicates that less of the tread will come in contact with the road.
Therefore, the friction will decrease and the rolling resistance will decrease. In addition to this, the vehicle’s fuel efficiency will also increase.
Due to its narrower grooves, the MaxProof has a higher contact patch. Thus, more of its tread will be in contact with the road’s surface and the rolling resistance will increase. The higher rolling resistance will also reduce its fuel efficiency.
Comparison of comfort
Due to the wider grooves present in the Outlast, air particles will have more space to entrap themselves inside its voids.
As a result, when the vehicle moves at a higher speed, these air particles will strike back and forth, creating more noise. As a result, they are less comfortable to drive.
MaxLife’s grooves are narrower than those of its competitor. Therefore, there will not be much room for air particles to get stuck inside and strike against the groove walls.
Because of this, this tire will produce relatively little noise and you will enjoy a comfortable ride even at high speeds.
Treadwear & Durability
The special silica compound used in its construction makes Outlast a more durable option thanks to its high-quality materials.
The dry and wet traction of these tires is therefore not as good as its competitors, but the users will still be able to enjoy a durable tire that will last for years. Additionally, its tread will also wear out slower due to its lower rolling resistance.
MaxLife, however, is a less durable option due to its higher rolling resistance. Furthermore, this tire has a dual compound tread that enhances its traction. The tread, however, wears out faster due to the enhanced traction.
Pricing of Goodyear Assurance Outlast Vs Goodyear Assurance MaxLife
The price range for both tires is nearly the same, but MaxLife is a few bucks more expensive than its competitor because of its enhanced traction and comfort.
The Outlast, on the other hand, is a good option to consider if you are looking for a less expensive option because of its strong hydroplaning capabilities and low rolling resistance.
Conclusion of Goodyear Assurance Outlast Vs Goodyear Assurance MaxLife
- Both tires are All-Season tires.
- The performance of Outlast on snowy tracks is superior to that of MaxLife on dry, wet, and icy surfaces.
- Outlast has better hydroplaning resistance.
- The rolling resistance of Outlast is also lower, resulting in better fuel efficiency.
- The MaxLife is more comfortable to drive on roads.
- Outlast tread will wear out slower, increasing its durability.
- MaxLife is a more expensive tire.
Video Comparison of Goodyear Assurance Outlast Vs Goodyear Assurance MaxLife
You May Like:
References and Resources: