Comparison between BFGoodrich Trail Terrain T/A Vs KO2 was a tough task because these are looks similar in quality. While KO2 is an All-Terrain tire, its competitor is a Trail Terrain tire. Both are built to perform well on and off the road.
Due to its narrower grooves and numerous 3D sipes, the Trail Terrain T/A offers a smooth and controlled driving experience.
Due to its wide grooves and strong stone ejectors, the KO2 performs better on muddy, snowy, and rocky terrains.
Stick with us until the end to find out which tire offers the best comfort and durability!
Comparisons in general
The Trail Terrain is designed with full-depth 3D sipes and an optimized footprint for excellent on-road and off-road performance. Two outer shoulders and numerous central blocks run around the tread, separated by narrow longitudinal and lateral grooves.
Additionally, the shoulder lugs on this tire are dense and closely packed. As with the central part, the shoulder blocks also have numerous 3D sipes.
The serrated shoulder design of the KO2 provides excellent performance off-road. In comparison, this tire has broad shoulders and large shoulder lugs.
There are numerous blocks found in between the shoulders and all of them are separated The tread is characterized by relatively wide grooves.
The sipes on the tread pattern are not as effective as those found on the Trail Terrain T/A. Therefore, there is a huge difference between the two tires when it comes to hydroplaning resistance and icy terrains.
Comparison of on-road traction
With its narrower grooves and closely spaced tread blocks, the Trail Terrain offers superior on-road dry traction. As a result, it offers better grip and reduced stopping distance.
For wet conditions, the tire needs to wipe a decent amount of water to maintain its traction and avoid hydroplaning. We were impressed with the tire’s wet traction as well.
On the central part and the shoulders, the 3D sipes are quite deep and numerous. The tread allows a decent amount of water to pass through, resulting in a lower braking distance and excellent grip.
KO2 has wider grooves and larger tread blocks than its competitor. As a result, the tread surface area has the least amount of contact with the road.
Thus, the overall traction of the tire on dry roads is reduced and the braking distance is also longer. The tread also has fewer and less effective sipes, which reduces the tire’s wet traction.
In extreme weather conditions, the sipes will not be effective at wiping away water, resulting in hydroplaning.
Comparison of off-road traction
Due to Trail Terrain’s narrower grooves, its mud traction is limited. Narrower grooves cannot effectively remove mud from its tread, and as a result, mud will accumulate within the grooves. There is a high probability that the tire will turn slick as well.
Due to its higher void ratio, KO2 is incredibly effective in the mud. By throwing mud backward, its wide grooves will be incredibly effective in evacuating mud. Additionally, the wide shoulders of these tires provide easy passage for mud to escape. KO2’s performance in muddy terrain is second to none.
Regarding Trail Terrain’s performance on soft snow, it is less effective than its counterpart. This is due to the narrower grooves of these tires, which prevent effective evacuation of soft snow.
As a result, there is a chance that the grooves will be filled with snow and the tire will lose its grip. However, their ice traction is excellent due to their higher contact patch and numerous 3D sipes. The vehicle will be able to drive safely on icy roads.
Due to its wider grooves, the KO2 maintains its grip well on soft snow. The grooves assist the tire in moving forward and pushing the soft snow backward. The lower contact patch of these tires could pose problems on icy roads.
As it is not equipped with bold stone ejectors, the Trail Terrain T/A’s performance lags a bit behind on rocky terrains. Due to this, the tire will not be able to protect itself in harsh conditions and will be vulnerable to rocks and pebbles. Because of this, we would advise you not to drive the vehicle on rocky terrain.
On the other hand, the tire’s stone ejectors make it unmatched on rocky terrains. Strong stone ejectors are capable of removing stones and pebbles from grooves. In addition to reducing the chances of puncture, this will also help protect the tread from damages such as cuts and chips.
Convenience of BFGoodrich Trail Terrain T/A Vs KO2
As a result of the Trail Terrain T/A’s lower void ratio, fewer air particles will get trapped inside its grooves. This will dampen the noise while driving at high speeds.
When it comes to unpaved paths, the grooves of the tire are not wide enough. Therefore, it will not be able to absorb jerks as effectively as its competitor. This will reduce the tire’s off-road comfort.
KO2 has a higher void ratio in comparison. There will therefore be more space for the air particles to travel inside its void. As a result, the trapped air will strike against the walls and cause a loud sound to be produced while driving at a higher speed.
This will reduce the on-road comfort of these tires. Due to the wider grooves, users will get a comfortable ride when off-roading. The grooves will absorb all the jerks and bumps as you travel over rough terrain.
Treadwear & Durability
The treadwear determines the tire’s durability. In general, the higher the rolling resistance, the faster the treadwear rate. Because of its narrower grooves, the All Terrain T/A has higher rolling resistance here.
As a result, the tire will require more energy to roll on the road, and the tread will deteriorate faster as well. Additionally, the build of these tires does not permit better tread wear resistance since it is not much stronger. All of these factors combined will result in lower mileage for the drivers as well.
In contrast, the KO2 has a lower rolling resistance than its competitor. As a result, its tread will wear out slower. The excellent construction of the tires further enhances their durability.
In addition to high-quality internal components that increase tread wear resistance, these tires are constructed with cuts and chip resistance compounds. These attributes make the KO2 an incredibly durable tire with excellent mileage.
Pricing of BFGoodrich Trail Terrain T/A Vs KO2
KO2 is a more expensive option due to its off-road performance and durability. The higher price is definitely worth it! The Trail Terrain, on the other hand, delivers excellent on-road traction and comfort without breaking the bank. The choice is ultimately yours.
Brief summary of BFGoodrich Trail Terrain T/A Vs KO2
- Trail Terrain has better on-road traction.
- The KO2 performs well in mud, soft snow, and rocky terrain.
- On icy terrain, Trail Terrain performs better.
- KO2 provides better off-road comfort and Trail Terrain provides better on-road comfort.
- Due to its lower rolling resistance, KO2 is a more durable option.
- The Trail Terrain T/A tire is a lower-priced option.
Video Comparison of BFGoodrich Trail Terrain T/A Vs KO2
References and Resources: