Off-road tires like the BFGoodrich KM3 VS Toyo M/T are top of the line, especially in soft terrain like mud, snow, and sand. One of the oldest and most reliable tire manufacturers is BFGoodrich and Toyo.
There is no doubt that both of these tires are of the highest quality. One tire, however, outperforms the other when it comes to tread-wear and durability.
Table of Contents
Comparison of BFGoodrich KM3 VS Toyo M/T
When it comes to off-road driving, the Goodrich KM3 is the best because of its high resistance combined with a larger, better grove design that can grab and throw materials like sand, snow, or mud so you can move easily across them.
Due to its higher rolling resistance, better hydro-planning, and higher wet traction design in its pattern, this tire is the best when it comes to gripping, when compared to any other tire.
As a result, these same features contribute to its downfall when it comes to tread-wear and durability, and severely impair its efficiency when driven on roads.
While designed for off-road driving, the Toyo M/T is also an aggressive design off-road tire. It incorporates a new technology (Attack tread design with hook-shaped blocks) that provides smaller groves than KM3, making it more stable and suitable for on-road use.
Having smaller groves and special thread patterns, it has lower rolling residence than its competitor, but also considerably better hydroplaning and wet traction, leading to greater efficiency and durability.
A comparison of the traction
Having good traction and grip on the tire is always important for safety and a better driving experience. However, some tires are better suited to different terrains than others.
Its mud phobic bars and Krawl-TEK compound technology enable it to move effortlessly through mud and snow, as well as sand and rocks, with world-class traction in mud, snow, sand, and rocky terrains.
With its flex zones, it provides more grip on rocky terrain due to its flexibility. However, wet traction on streets and well-paved surfaces isn’t as good due to large groves resulting in less surface area in contact with the road and creating more noise.
Similarly, the Toyo M/t excels in both wet and off-road terrains. The deep sipes in the tread blocks, along with its open scalloped shoulder blocks, help maintain a good grip on wet surfaces as well as mud, snow, sand, and rocks.
Its attack tread design features hook-shaped blocks, allowing for excellent hydroplaning along with a good surface area for good grip on dry surfaces like roads, as well as wet surfaces like mud.
Comparison of off-road Performance
KM3 and Toyo M/T are both classified as MT (Mud-Terrain) tires. Both are good for off-roading, but their performance on roads is reduced due to greater wear and tear.
Comparison of Hard Terrains
Due to its advanced Krawl-TEK compound material, KM3 is ideal for hard terrains like rocks and gravel. Coreguard Max technology makes it tougher and provides sidewall protection, reducing the risk of punctures and splits in the sidewall, making it more durable, agile, and firm in rough terrains.
Moreover, its linear flex zones provide extra grip on steep terrain.
Furthermore, the Toyo M/T performs well on hard terrain because of its Aggressive Attack tread design, which can handle obstacles or hurdles in its path, but lacks those extra features provided by the KM3, making it less durable on rugged surfaces.
Due to its extravagant features, KM3 is a better choice in hard terrains.
Comparison of Soft Terrains
Larger grooves are better suited for soft terrains since they provide efficient self-cleaning while allowing the tire to grab onto the surface.
Due to its Mud Phobic shoulders that can liberate mud effortlessly, combined with massive tread blocks in Terrain Attack tread pattern with big grooves that give it an amazing grip, the KM3 performs well in soft terrains like mud and sand.
KM3 is the best tire for soft terrains, but the Toyo M/T has plenty of features that make it one of the best. Block of tire is hook-shaped with aggressive Attack Tread design, large grooves but slightly less than KM3, and deep sipes that allow it to grip onto surfaces like mud and sand, providing exceptional performance off-road.
In addition, its shoulders are open-scalped and have tread over them, which makes it even better at tackling soft surfaces by increasing grip and handling.
On soft terrains, both tires perform equally well.
Comparison of comfort
Due to slightly fewer grooves than the KM3, M/T is more comfortable on the road than the KM3.
Blocks with hook shapes and deep sipes provide more contact surface area with the road, making it a more stable ride. In addition, it provides a comfortable ride on off-road tracks.
KM3 is also a good choice for off-roading, but on paved roads it is a bit squirrely and does not go smoothly due to its prominent grooves and shallow sipes.
Tread-Wear and Durability
A very good material called Krawl-Tek compound is used in the KM3 that gives an extra grip on rugged terrains, but wears out extremely quickly compared to the Toyo M/T. The Coreguard Max Technology enhances the tire’s durability on rugged terrain, but it doesn’t help much with tread wear.
All in all, the Toyo M/T outperforms the KM3 in tread-wear due to its 3-ply polyester construction that makes it last longer, as well as its hook-shaped blocks in the tread design that give it better contact surface area on both off-road and on-road tracks.
Difference in noise levels
Because both the KM3 and M/T tires have large grooves, they produce a significant amount of noise when they move through the air.
Despite this, the KM3 still produces more noise than the M/T due to slightly more groves between the blocks.
Additionally, the M/T has deep sipes in the tread, which reduce noise even further. As a result, M/T stands out more in terms of noise.
Which looks better to you?
It’s true that both of these tires have an aggressive design that makes them stand out more than the others, but the KM3’s Terrain Attack tread pattern makes it appear more appealing.
In M/T, a hooked-shaped block pattern stands out from anything we’ve seen before, grabbing the attention of its viewers and looking cool in its own way.
Evaluation of customer satisfaction
Customer feedback indicates that the KM3 is one of the best tires for off-roading, it offers good traction in both rugged and soft terrain.
When driven on road, these vehicles produce a lot of noise and wear out extremely quickly, which makes them highly uneconomical. Until 20000 to 25000 miles, it performs well, but after that, problems start to arise.
In addition to being a top-notch off-road tire, the M/T tire is mainly used on soft terrains. Furthermore, it is considerably quieter than the KM3 and performs well on the road as well. Long-term, it is more economical and performs well.
With ease, it can provide 35000 to 40000 miles.
Price comparison of BFGoodrich KM3 VS Toyo M/T
Toyo M/T tires cost slightly more than BFGoodrich KM3. In terms of features, the KM3 is the winner. When it comes to economy and durability, M/T wins by a wide margin. Therefore, Toyo M/T is a better economical choice with a similar user experience to KM3.
Final Thoughts on BFGoodrich KM3 VS Toyo M/T
This comparison has the following significant points:
- BFGoodrich KM3 and Toyo M/T are M/T (Mud Terrain) tires that perform well off-road, but perform better on roads.
- KM3 and M/T both have good traction on soft terrain, but KM3 is better suited for hard terrain.
- On road, KM3 produces more noise than M/T.
- Due to greater tread-wear in the KM3, M/T is more durable than KM3 when it comes to optimal functioning. However, KM3 is more robust and can withstand rugged terrain. Yet, M/T offers almost the same experience at a lower cost.
Video of BFGoodrich KM3 VS Toyo M/T
References and Resources: